Category: Science and Medicine
The Novocaine Pushers: Numbing People to Obvious Dangers of COVID and MAHA.
COVID and MAHA weren't just dangerous, they were obviously dangerous. Yet, there was a coordinated effort to numb people to their risks,
RFK Jr. is definitely coming for your vaccines (part 13): The NIH “Vaccinology and Immunology Center”
Robert F. Kennedy Jr.'s new "vaccine injury" clinic finally has a name, but its purpose hasn't changed: To generate "evidence" to justify eliminating vaccines.
Retracted: Study of ivermectin and mebendazole for cancer removed by publisher
The story of a research publication that met an abrupt, but just end.
Dr. Jay Bhattacharya Blew Off Literal Death From COVID. Why Should Anyone Care About His New “Vaccine Injury” Clinic?
Unless he finds a side effect that is worse than a 1 in 500 risk of literal death, we can all follow his lead and blow it off as "very moderate".
Snake Oil to Compounded Peptides: Why We Ask For Evidence
The USA's path to legalizing peptides risks leaving consumers with unanswered questions about quality, safety and effectiveness.
“Is it Your Assertion That Picking Headlines of Dead Kids is a Good Way to Evaluate a Policy?”
What matters more than reality itself?
I Used to Wonder How the Tuskegee Experiment Could Have Happened. No More.
The cowards and sycophants who enabled, promoted, and normalized MAHA in any way are collectively to blame for its attempt to do Tuskegee 2.0.
The EBM Gurus, RCT Zealots, & “Sensible” Doctors Who Gave Us Kennedy’s Chemtrails, Wakefield’s Wins, Paxton’s Prosecutions, & Schwartz’s Study
Though these examples just scratch the surface, they are the end result of the doctors I've written about previously, as well as the academic and media ecosystems that promoted them.
“Health Freedom” Leaders are Health Authoritarians
"The centerpiece of the MAHA and health freedom agenda has been removal of mRNA shots."
If the BMJ Wants to Revisit Venerable Institutions Who Misled the Public in 2021, They Should Look Inward at the BMJ
Until the BMJ demonstrate the integrity to revisit their own dismal failures regarding life and death matters, there's no reason to care about their opinions regarding less consequential issues, is there?